The dialectic and the tension between security and comfort, which are provided by rule constructions for a society, as well as the closing mechanisms of self-determination, self-development and degrees of freedom are dealt with. Social demands and expectations are contrasted with individualism and empowerment. In the formal structure of suits, a symbol of generally accepted and respected uniforms, the burden and constriction that these mechanisms of control and the exercise of power can entail was made tangible in a processional form in the performance, while maintaining social conformity. Crises, exceptional and extreme situations, but also their staging, have always opened up the existentialist questioning and reflection of previously lived values, norms and constructions of rules. They generate a space of possibility and contingency.  Are implicit values of rules even negotiable for society? And according to which rules do we want or do I want to live at all? The title WHY refers to the question of why we impose certain rules on ourselves in the sense of self-management, but also allow them to be imposed on us, and always requires an explanation and explanation of our own reality to a counterpart. The convenience of rule-led reality must be questioned in a society in order to counteract tendencies of power-led authoritarianism with a force. The performance was realized in a harsh nature, which humanity tries to dominate and to stand out from. It builds culture as a humane substitute for nature as well as a comfort zone out of a threat to nature and wraps this externalized nature in a socio-structural coating in order to absorb the borderline experiences still possible in nature. In these original, natural spaces, most of the social rules and structures are now abolished; we are then thrown back onto an independent and mature self, but as part of nature.